Skip to content

Gone Girl

Originally published in the Durango Telegraph

My favorite movies are ones in which I forget that I’m watching a movie. By that I don’t mean that I forget that I’m in a theater, or that I forget the things happening on the screen aren’t really happening.  That would be terrifying, and bizarre. I mean that I get so engrossed in the story itself – in what just happened, in what’s going to happen next — that I forget to pay attention to the individual elements of filmmaking — like the acting, the script, the pacing, the effects, etc.  I get so caught up in the telling of a good story that I barely notice how it’s being told.

That what happened while I was watching “Gone Girl.”  It is, without a doubt, an expertly directed, well-acted, perfectly shot and scored movie, but all those elements submit themselves to the telling of the story in such a perfect way that you’re unlikely to think about them while watching. Like the ingredients in a truly great soup, or the individual players on the San Antonio Spurs, they all work together to create something bigger and better than its individual elements.

And my gosh, what a story.  I think “Gone Girl” could easily have been turned into a TV show instead of a movie – it’s got plot to spare.  The suspense and the twists could have gone on for several seasons. Unfortunately (for me at least,) it’s also full of twists and turns, all of them great, none of which I want to give away in this review, which means that, after the first 45 minutes of the film, I have to talk about it in extremely vague and un-writer-ly terms.

Ben Affleck plays a Missouri boy who moved to New York to pursue a career as a magazine writer. (Are you considered a journalist if you mostly write about what to wear?) He meets Rosamund Pike, a born and bred New Yorker, who is also a writer. Their romance is almost unbearable cute and clever – for a few minutes, I thought I had accidentally stumbled into a Nicholas Sparks movie. “We’re so cute I could punch us both in the face,” Pike says on one date, and I agree. But things don’t stay that way.

The recession hits, they both get laid off, Affleck’s mom gets sick, and they move back to Missouri to take care of her. Pike is a fish out of water in the Midwest, they struggle financially, and their marriage crumbles. Affleck manages a bar he co-owns with his twin sister, and Pike stays home in their McMansion and reads crime novels. She has no friends, and he has no idea how she spends her days. One of them wants a baby, the other doesn’t. They hardly speak to each other.

Until one day, Pike disappears. At first, the signs point to a kidnapping, though there’s never any ransom demands. Then, dark secrets start to be revealed, and the case switches from kidnapping to murder, with Affleck as the primary suspect.

And that’s about as far as I can go, without giving away the first of many big twists in the story.  Suffice it to say the police are way off track, and never really do get on the right one.  Affleck does, though, and that’s when things get really interesting – and then they change again, and interesting becomes horrifying.  I can’t say any more, except that there are a couple of rednecks up to no good (they figure out in about six seconds what everyone else can’t see) and a super-rich Neil Patrick Harris with a super-creepy lake house. “Gone Girl” features one of the most interesting and memorable villains in recent memory, as well as one of the most shocking murder scenes in a long while.  The whole theater gasped.  I gasped with them.

But there’s more going on here than just a crackerjack plot. One of the major themes in the film is the difference between appearance and reality, and the ways different characters respond to that disparity. This isn’t a moral clumsily laid over the top of the story, but an idea that is one seamlessly into almost every element of it, from the way the Affleck and Pike’s marriage crumbles because neither of them can continue to keep up the facade they presented — that we all present — in those first happy, golden moments, to the way the media decides that Affleck is guilty of his wife’s murder before the police have even arrested him, and … well, to other, more disturbing ways as well.

Gillian Flynn wrote the novel “Gone Girl” is based on, and she also wrote the screenplay here, and the finished movie suggests that she worked closely with director David Fincher to make sure that her vision was well represented on the screen. Their strengths dovetail nicely. The material plays well to Fincher’s strengths; like “Seven” and “Zodiac,” he’s more interested in why people do terrible things to each other, and what that says about the world they live in, than in what the terrible things are, or how they get caught… or don’t.  “Gone Girl” is a film of icy depths – it’s decidedly cool on the surface, but provides just the right number of well-placed clues so that we know that these characters, all of them, are not at all what they appear to be on the surface. Figuring out who exactly they are is going to be the subject of many late night college dorm room conversations.

“Gone Girl” starts as a pretty straightforward police procedural, but by the end, it’s something more like a horror movie. I was powerfully reminded of Hitchcock in the final act, especially of “Vertigo.” It’s a powerful film, certainly one of the best of the year, but it doesn’t end nicely. This is one you should watch, but then you might want to take a shower afterwards. It’s hard to shake.


Be Sociable, Share!

Posted in All Reviews, by Will Krischke.

One Response

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Continuing the Discussion

  1. Top 10 Movies of 2014 - linked to this post on July 10, 2015

    […] 1. Gone Girl […]

Some HTML is OK

(never shared)

or, reply to this post via trackback.